Monday, September 14, 2009

The American Way


It’s the American way. Earn more money, buy on credit, the new work ethic, owe more than you can pay.

Not the true spirit of the “American Way” and while I’m sure of that, I’m suspicious of any definition of a lifestyle that touts itself as the American Way. There are several elements that need to be considered when one wants to understand how we got to this point with our excessive debt and loss of what I term meaningful activity. This is what the adverstising and marketing talking heads want you believe justifies our social decline.

Consider where humans are going from here, and where we are going, in my not so humble opinion would be, insane, the loony bin, the ultimate human destination. My thoughts on the subject follow in a rambling discourse.

Have you heard the lines of Henry David Thoreau’s "Economy," where he commented that most men are slaves to their work and enslaved to those for whom they work, concluding;

"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."

He wrote that at Walden Pond, where he stated; "I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived. I did not wish to live what was not life, living is so dear; nor did I wish to practice resignation..."

We will come back to that in a moment. Now, let’s back up a bit. Back up say several thousands of years, to the Paleolithic era. For the humans of the time life was a bitch, talk about desperation! There was nothing quite about it and the only species of human to survive from that time, through the Neolithic age was of course homo sapiens, us.

So Thoreau went to the woods to live deliberately, to understand the essential facts of life, and learn what they had to teach so that when he came to die he would not feel that he had not lived.

Thoreau missed it. He had a cabin, heat, books, paper, an outhouse, etc… Another thing he had was solitude. I don’t think our distant ancestors had much use for solitude, or many opportunities to consider what a time of self-absorption could provide them. The ancestors had to satisfy Maslow’s basic needs for safety, food and shelter and they were involved in that pursuit seven days a week, twenty-four hours a day.

Not much changed in the Neolithic era or the early days of the metal ages. In the civilizations of the late Neolithic and Bronze age there were cottage industries where slaves or very menial workers toiled for an owner or employer to make goods by hand. For this labor they received food and clothing or some type of agreed upon wage. There were no vacations, no health plans, no nada, work, work, work, desperation and keep quite about it.

That goes on until the age of enlightenment and the discovery of ways to harness power from wind, water, and steam. Now the employer could offer hundreds of jobs and at the same time hold every worker responsible to get’er done. This was followed with the concept that humans should not be treated as beasts of labor but should gain some measure of satisfaction from their efforts.

Enter Thoreau and his whining about dying with the satisfaction of having known that he had lived. That illusion of purpose and a reason for existence has been converted to a string of half-hour situation comedies, a mortgage and a car payment. Which again gets us to Thoreau and coming to die knowing that we have in-fact lived. Blow-up your television, drive a really cheap car, better yet, take the bus. Love, dance, f**k, sing, read, walk, camp under the stars, f**k some more and never let anyone harness you to a labor that diminishes your soul.

Our Paleolithic, Neolithic Bronze, Iron age ancestors lived lives of total desperation, so that we could have two weeks paid vacation every year. Moving to the present era, the great American Revolution that got the current system of government started was supported by less than half of the residents of the original states. While many of our forbearers were freezing their a*s off at Valley Forge, more than a few of the established families were loyal to the English government. The government of George III and his predecessors provided the loyal English citizens with the means to grow their wealth, often at the expense of others who served as indentured or bound slaves.

The revolt in American, driven by a desire for home rule was not necessarily a popular notion. The ideals of modern industry were still in their infancy in seventeen-eighty and life was not always about family and home. The number of poor who lived by their wits or handouts to obtain food, clothing and shelter is not considered when we mention the spirit of American freedom. How many people scraped a living from wherever they could in the late eighteen hundreds? Put a musket in a starving mans hand and a coat of course blue wool on his back and he’ll fight, especially of you march him down a road to where the boys in red can get a shot at him.

As soon as the ink was dry on the declaration of independence there was a line of folks looking for a government handout. Roll forward to eighteen sixty-six an you have the freed slaves looking for “masta Lincoln to provide." Sure, right after you gets Mr. Johnson’s attention.

A day’s wages for a day’s labor, but who gets to say how much a day’s wages should be and for how much labor?

Sunday, September 13, 2009

God of the Philistines


“Honey, I wish I knew. I’ve thought about it a lot over the years, humans kill in the name of their god, but why do they kill at all.”


I followed my daughter’s gaze out across the mirror of rain soaked pavement. Darker shadows formed out of the black of early morning. A glow of cigarette lit a half shadow, a man’s silhouette, made sinister by what the light didn’t show. I felt a shiver of someone else’s deja` vu.


The shadows and rain and early grey light cast a Great Depression pall on the scene. I took up the conversation about war and killing and gods. “I always come back to the idea that god didn’t tell anyone to do anything. We humans wrote out some words and said they were from god.”


I studied my child’s profile in the dim light, her nose, chin and lips, a classic beauty. Smart and head strong, she carried her concerns for the world and her passion for life openly, exposed to the dangers of a harsh reality. “Logic, to me says killing another human is wrong for any reason, especially in the name of a god. Faith in a deity is all well and good and each person should do what feels right for them. But before I listen to someone preach about their god’s goodness and glory they have to learn to live with the other human animals around them, in peace.”


Across the road, a freight train rumbled south, transmitted its vibrations over the parking lot and through the pickup's cab. I was quit while it passed. “Empirical knowledge should be the first law of man. It’s the twenty-first century, don’t ask people to believe or act on a belief which cannot be supported by indisputable evidence. Cold hard facts are what it requires. Roswell, crop circles, god said; fiction and it’s all in the same realm for me. Bring me the body, show me the spaceship, let the gods speak for themselves.”


Now my daughter spoke up. “What about faith? Aren’t we supposed to have faith in God? Faith that God knows what he’s doing.”


I rubbed at my chin then blathered on. “All the writings that ask us to have faith in god, any god were done by man. So first we have to have faith that the hand of man was at sometime in ancient history guided by a deity that no longer speaks to us. I can’t buy any of that. All the writings are biased to their time and society. Today’s proponents for the gods tell us that their deity doesn’t need to communicate with us anymore, that its time for us to live in faith. I can’t buy it. Science and industry have not changed our nature, just given us more ways to be corrupt. If a god ever spoke to mankind he would still be talking. Every ancient writing points to a massive ego. Why do people kill for god? They don’t kill for god, they kill for ego and gain, purely human reasons, we just use god for convenience. If people had to accept responsibility for their actions it might be different. Take gods out of the equation. Would we be as willing to kill just because we don’t like each other? It might reduce some of the death, but not all of it."I detoured the subject; "We humans are the only creature in the universe, at least the only one we have physical evidence of that are capable of significantly altering their environment. Faith has nothing to do with it. Faith is a form of surrender, to a high power, to no power, to the unknown."


I took a deep breathe, it's true, I much prefer reason and logic. Logic is a chasm of thought that the vast majority of people cannot even stand to consider. The thought that there is no afterlife is unacceptable to them. The idea that what you have from the time you’re born to the time you die is all that you’re going to get. It scares people because they don’t want to die the final death. I don’t see it that way, I don’t have a problem with it, it just means that if I’m going to do something I have to do it now, I can’t wait until I get to paradise.


This is paradise, or it can be. Is it a bad thing that we are animals with a finite life? The way I see it, we won the biggest crap game there has ever been. We got born, and with enough brains to enjoy the life we have, we won.


Living with faith in a god is ok too but first you have to learn that your profession of faith is only good for you, not your wife, children, friends or neighbors. While the Christ of the western bible was discussing taxes when he said render unto Cesar that which is Cesar’s, I think the idea works for existing within a social framework as well. To live at peace in a well ordered society should be the first requirement of any deity’s faith.


Render to society a peaceful coexistence with other human animals. I get a kick out of the cars with the fish on the back, when the behavior of the driver is saying that the rest of us no have place on their road.


How about a new "proud-to-be sticker": Proud to be an asshole and to have ruined your day.

Thinking About Thinking

Beyond being aware of the issues and having a passing interest, what issues do you want to act on?
What can you do that will have a tangible result? How will it affect your family, community, work environment, ETC?
Consider the sign carrying supporter of any issue that you personally see as irresolvable. Remember; there are individuals and groups that will see your issue in that same irresolvable way. What can you do to change their minds? Why should anyone be concerned over the issues you support.
Does your issue affect the basic pyramid of human needs; (safety, shelter, nourishment). If so will it have a positive effect on society? When will the changes become evident; (immediate, near term, long term) Consider as well the magnitude of the group that any action issue will be dealing with. Effective action takes energy: E=MC2 --- The bigger the group the more it will take to influence action.---
Population:
Local 126 thousand people in St. Johns County,
State of Florida 18.5 million,
USA 315 million, Global 6.1 billion--
How you going to pay for it?
Who has the Money?
Commercial funding?
Research Money?
Profit? Capitol?
Government funding: Local? State? National?
Time is money: 168 hours in a week = 1 person’s effort 24/7.
What do you have more of, time or money? Where will you get more of either? How will you determine requirements for each?
Conflicting and/or competing issues: Religious beliefs and conflict between religious groups. Social norms differing views across states and non-religious groups. Political party platforms (Left–Right)Urban/rural livingEnvironmental/industrial concerns (name a few) opposition by foreign countries and foreign non-government powers.
Building an Action Case:
What is you objective; (near term result, long term result, combination of the two) What strategic actions will best achieve the desired objective?
How?
What tactics do you see as most effective?
Why?
(Tactics are concerned with the conduct of an activity.
Strategy is concerned with how different activities are linked.)
In other words, how an objective is achieved is a combination of strategic actions; tactics are how the individual actions are conducted.---
Whether an objective should be an actionable goal at all is a matter of strategy. (Choose your battles wisely!)
Example:
Health Care Reform
Questions:
Should there be a government funded health care system?
Who should it be for, all U.S. citizens, all human beings living in the U.S.?
Will those who can afford health care stand in line and wait with the ones who have no other option?
Who opposes this issue?
Those who want fewer taxes?
Those who want less government?
The American Medical Association?
State an Action Objective:
Create a U.S. nation wide health care system that provides out & in-patient care to all human beings residing in the U.S.
Questions:
If the U.S. congress/senate approved such a program, how will we fund it?
How will it be organized?
Who exactly will it benefit?
How will and what will the physicians get paid?
How will the pharmaceuticals companies get paid?
Will the pharmacetials foster new research if the large profits for senior executives are eliminated?
Strategy 1. Convince the American people that universal health care is a good thing.
Tactic 1A - Mass media campaign on the negative results of not having an HC system.
Tactic 1B - Mass media campaign with all the positive aspects of having an HC system.
Tactic 1C - Media campaign to gain the support of medical and pharmaceuticals communities.
Strategy 2. Address HC system funding concerns through creation of efficient processes in other areas of the federal government.
Tactic 2A - Reduce compensation for federally elected officials.
Tactic 2B - Reduce support to foreign nations.
Tactic 2C - Reduce military activity.
The "Example" Is just that, and none if it contains actions I recommend.

Academic Creative Writing


Academic creative writing, while necessary, is often an ill-conceived term. Academic writing, a class assignment done to satisfy a task, suffers from being required vise original inspiration. While academic writing can be inspired and stand with the best of original creative writing, that; however, is not the norm.


When I hear “academic creative writing” I understand what oxymoronic means. There appears to be a disconnect that occurs when students, even those who foster dreams of being writers are tasked with writing assignments. They create stories and poems and screenplays that satisfy a requirement other than their own existence. I understand that I’m considered overbearing and demanding. I can take it, better to be called overbearing that have to listen to or read creative writing papers that the student feels as their most accomplished work, while thoughts of suicide race around my skull. These papers, often without peer in their punctuation and sentence structure with no spirit and no vitality.


Every academic has preferences about grammar, story structure, plot development, conflict and resolution. Every instructor has their list of comments about what they want to see. But the creative elements of fiction are not bound by the rules of academia. It is good to understand the rules and what can be done with them, but writing well does not require that you follow them with more than a passing acknowledgement.


The formal teaching process for writers is not the subject here. The refinement of a writer’s ability will not occur in the classroom because grades will not a writer make. This is about the development of individual style and skill and the road to development is different for every writer. The development of voice, of style and structure that will carry a reader across a story with continued interest is not defined by a text book.


A writer’s voice comes from several sources. It can be learned, it can be inherited, but it cannot be taught. A mentor, weather it’s a professor or in a less formal relationship can give guidance that developing writers can adapt to their own use. The feel, the focus on what a reader wants in the books they select is what turns a student into a writer.